Efficient consumer appliances remain difficult for financial institutions to finance at scale because eligibility is rarely defined in a way that links product performance, national labelling systems and climate finance criteria. May’s Cool Talk on Taxonomies for Financing Efficient Consumer Appliances examined how classification frameworks can translate product efficiency standards into practical financing criteria, helping banks identify eligible appliances, structure use-of-proceeds lending, and track climate impact. This is an important step to close the gap between the current business-as-usual and the potential $600 billion annual market for sustainable cooling.
Moderator Rusmir Musić, Global Cooling Lead at the World Bank Group, framed the discussion around a persistent visibility gap in cooling finance. Many financial institutions may already be financing cooling assets, but cannot identify or track them because they are bundled into agriculture, green buildings, or wider energy efficiency portfolios. “Practical tools such as positive lists can help institutions compare existing portfolios, isolate eligible assets, and expand dedicated lending for efficient cooling,” offered Musić.
Building on that link between identification and investment, Patrick Blake, Programme Manager at UNEP’s United for Efficiency initiative, outlined the role of standards in giving finance a credible technical basis. In his opening remarks, Blake explained that Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPs) set the market floor by removing the least efficient products, while labels and financial incentives can push demand toward higher-performing appliances. “MEPS eliminate the least efficient products from the market, but financial incentives and taxonomies can help advance products further in terms of efficiency and environmental impacts,” he said. For cooling products, he stressed, these frameworks must address both energy efficiency and refrigerants.